is stripped at build. --}}

I do this for other people's systems

What it involves, who it suits, and when it is not worth your money.

The method in the book, pointed at your system instead of mine. I map every flow and prove each one is really moving data, then try to break the checks to see whether they notice.

Fixed scope, fixed fee, and a defined end. Not open-ended consulting, and nobody gets embedded in your team.

What you get

  • Your flows, written down. Most teams have never seen this.
  • A verdict on each one, with the evidence attached.
  • The checks installed and running in your CI after I leave.
  • A written report your engineers can argue with.

When it is worth doing

  • You are shipping AI-assisted code into production, with a real event bus or pipeline rather than a single service.
  • Your monitoring is green and you are not completely sure you believe it.
  • Somebody on your team has said I think that's running, and nobody followed up.

When it is not

  • You want a code review, a linter, or a security audit. Different problems, better people.
  • Your system is a prototype. Nothing has had time to go quietly dead yet.
  • You want someone embedded for months. This ends, on purpose.

If you describe your system and the honest answer is that an audit would find nothing, I would rather say so than take the work.

Where it is contracted

This site is the book and the free material, and I would like it to stay that way. The audit runs through my own company, CleanAim Inc, and the scope and the way to start a conversation both live there.

The full scope, on the company site

What the audit covers, what it produces, and how it runs.

See the full scope